
FRI’s HEAL JCOIN Grant: A comparative effectiveness trial of extended-release naltrexone versus extended-release buprenorphine with individuals leaving jail.

FRI’s HEAL JCOIN Grant: A comparative effectiveness trial of extended-release naltrexone versus extended-release buprenorphine with individuals leaving jail.
A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Extended-Release Naltrexone versus Extended-Release Buprenorphine with Individuals Leaving Jail
Principal Investigator (Primary Contact): Michael S. Gordon, D.P.A.
Co-Principal Investigator: Thomas Blue, Ph.D.
Co-Investigator: Frank Vocci, Ph.D.
Co-Investigator: Sean Murphy, Ph.D.
Co-Investigator: Marc Fishman, M.D.
Project Manager: Isabella Cheremeteff
Funded By: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Grant #: UG1DA050077
Total Project Period: 7/19 – 4/24
This study is a randomized, open label, controlled trial of extended-release buprenorphine (XR-B; BRIXADI™ formulation) versus extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) in Maryland jails. A mulit-site, open-label, equivalence design will randomly assign 240 adults with a history of opioid use disorder (OUD) within gender and jail who are nearing release to one of two treatment arms: 1) XR-B in jail or 2) XR-NTX in jail, both followed by 6 monthly injections post-release at a community treatment program.
Aim 1. To determine the effectiveness of XR-B compared to XR-NTX in terms of: Primary Outcome. (a) pharmacotherapy adherence (number of monthly injections received). Secondary Outcomes. (b) illicit opioid urine test results; (c) self-reported illicit opioid use; (d) overdose events (non-fatal and fatal); (e) quality of life (i. physical health; ii. mental health); (f) HIV risk behaviors (i. sexual behavior; ii. needle use or sharing); and (g) criminal activity (i. crime days; ii. re-arrest; iii. re-incarceration).
Aim 2. To use a learning collaborative to understand factors related to: (a) Acceptability of providing long-acting agonists and antagonists in jail settings; and (b) Feasibility of providing medication continuity of care from jail to community treatment providers.
Aim 3. To calculate the cost to the jail/county health system of implementing XR-NTX/XR-B, and determine the relative value, including the costs associated with the interventions in the community, from a county and state-policymaker and societal perspective.
Reducing Medication Diversion in Jails | PDF
Ms. Angel Dalverny, BSN, RN, Allegany County Sheriff’s Office, Detention Center
This presentation covers:
How to Increase Inmate Acceptance of MOUDS (Especially Injectables) | PDF
Major Craig Rowe, Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Detention Center
This presentation covers:
House Bill 116: Peer Recovery Specialists | PDF
Acting Warden Margaret M. Chippendale, Howard County Department of Corrections
This presentation covers:
The Intersectionality of Peer Support and Criminal Defense | PDF
Mr. Kevin Nock, i-FPRS, CPRS, RPS, Office of the Public Defender
This presentation covers:
Expanding Buprenorphine Treatment Using Telemedicine in Rural Counties | PDF
This presentation covers:
Methadone Treatment for People in Jail: Different Approaches to Increase Access | PDF
This presentation covers:
Methadone Challenges at the Kent County Detention Center | PDF
Presenter: Captain Steve Wallace, Kent County Department of Corrections
This presentation covers:
The Patient’s Journey: Supporting Community Reentry for People Starting MOUDs in Jail | PDF
Presenters: Ms. Laura Stewart Webb, Ms. Kim Sollers, & Mr. Christopher Plummer, Pyramid Healthcare
This presentation covers:
Guidance Documents (usdoj.gov)
SAMHSA Email Updates (list-manage.com)
Training Materials and Resources | SAMHSA (usdoj.gov)
Free Anti-Stigma Training for Maryland’s OUD Treatment Community
Virtual Meeting: Substance Use, Criminal Justice System Involvement, and Stigma (2-24-2021)
Maryland’s Office of Overdose Response
JCOIN Speaker Series: Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Criminal Justice Settings (3-5-2021)